文章摘要
丁燕,岳玲,王静华,郭茜,严峰,肖世富,洪波,李冠军.左前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激改善阿尔茨海默病精神行为症状的随机双盲对照研究[J].老年医学与保健,2023,29(5):997-1001
左前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激改善阿尔茨海默病精神行为症状的随机双盲对照研究
A randomized,double-blind controlled study on high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the left prefron-tal lobe to improve psychological and behavioral symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2023.05.026
中文关键词: 阿尔茨海默病  精神行为症状  重复经颅磁刺激
英文关键词: Alzheimer's disease  psychological and behavioral symptom  repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
基金项目:
作者单位
丁燕 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科上海交通大学阿尔茨海默病诊治中心 
岳玲 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
王静华 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
郭茜 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
严峰 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
肖世富 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
洪波 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
李冠军 上海交通大学附属精神卫生中心老年精神科 
摘要点击次数: 10
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 通过随机双盲对照研究,探索左前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激(repetitivetranscranial magnetic stimulation,rTMS)对阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer's disease,AD)的精神行为症状(behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia,BPSD)的疗效及安全性.方法 筛选2020 年4 月至2022 年1 月在上海市精神卫生中心老年科住院的AD患者45 例,年龄60~85 岁,符合简明精神状况量表(MMSE):2~24 分;临床痴呆评定量表(CDR):1~3 分;Hachinski 缺血指数量表(HIS)≤4 分;痴呆病理行为评定量表(BEHAVE-AD)≥8 分.采用随机、双盲、伪刺激对照的临床实验设计,将患者分为rTMS干预真刺激组和伪刺激组,每天治疗1 次,持续约22 min左右,每周5 次,4 周,共20 次,最终完成实验的患者28例(真刺激组13 例,伪刺激组15 例).2 组均给予常规药物治疗,在基线期和4 周干预结束后,分别进行疗效和安全性评估.结果 干预后,真刺激组的神经精神症状量表(NPI)、AD病理行为评分表(BEHAVE-AD)及柯恩-曼斯菲尔德激越情绪行为量表(CMAI)的减分高于伪刺激组,分别为(28.85±8.23)vs(8.20±6.79)、(12.85±7.76)vs(7.07±4.57)、(16.31±6.68)vs(9.47±6.86),差异均存在统计学意义(p<0.05);真刺激组的NPI量表妄想、激越、情绪不稳和异常行为4 个因子减分高于伪刺激组,差异存在统计学意义(p<0.05);真刺激组抗精神病药物日剂量增量低于伪刺激组(9 vs 50),差异存在统计学意义(p<0.05);真刺激组不良反应为短暂的头皮发紧 2 例和轻度头痛 1 例,伪刺激组为短暂的头皮发紧1 例和面部肌肉收缩感1 例,2 组患者均能耐受,发生率无统计学差异,均无严重不良事件.结论 左前额叶高频rTMS可能可以改善阿尔茨海默病患者精神行为症状,是一种安全有效的治疗方法.
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of high?frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the left prefrontal lobe on the psychological and behavioral symptoms (BPSD) of patients with Alzheimer??s disease (AD) through a randomized double?blind controlled study. Methods 45 AD patients, aged 60 to 85 years old, who were hos? pitalized in Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Mental Health Center of Shanghai City from April 2020 to January 2022, were selected. Their Concise Mental State Scale (MMSE) scores were 2?24, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) scores were 1?3, Hachinski Ischemia Index Scale (HIS) scores were≤4, and Dementia Pathological Behavior Rating Scale (Behave?AD) scores were≥8. A randomized, double?blind, pseudo?stimulus?controlled clinical trial design was used to divide the patients in? to rTMS true stimulation group and pseudo?stimulation group. Patients were treated once a day for about 22 minutes, 5 times a week, for a total of 4 weeks and 20 times. Finally, 28 patients completed the experiment (13 in the true stimulation group and 15 in the pseudo?stimulation group). Both groups were given conventional drug treatment, and the efficacy and safety were evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. Results After intervention, the reduction scores of NeuropsychiatricSymptom Inventory (NPI), Behavior?AD and Cohn Mansfield Agitated Emotional Behavior Scale (CMAI) in the true stimula? tion group was higher than that in the pseudo?stimulation group. They were 28. 85 ± 8. 23 vs 8. 20 ± 6. 79, 12. 85 ± 7. 76 vs 7?? 07 ±4. 57, 16. 31 ±6. 68 vs 9. 47 ±6. 86, respectively, with statistical significance (P <0. 05). The reduced scores of delu? sion, agitation, emotional instability, and abnormal behavior in the NPI scale of the true stimulation group were higher than those of the pseudo?stimulation group and the differences were statistically significant (P <0. 05). The daily dose increment of antipsychotic drugs in the true stimulation group was significantly lower than that in the pseudo?stimulation group (9 vs 50), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0. 05). In the true stimulation group, the adverse reactions were transient scalp tightness in 2 cases and mild headache in 1 case; in the pseudo?stimulation group, the adverse reactions were transient scalp tightness in 1 case and facial muscle contraction in 1 case. Both groups of patients were able to tolerate adverse reactions, and there was no significant difference in incidence. There were no serious adverse events in both groups. Conclusion High frequency rTMS in the left prefrontal lobe may improve the psychological and behavioral symptoms of AD patients, which is a safe and effective treatment method.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭